Cases 1 - 10 of 375
US v. Sanchez-Colberg
as 24-1392
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN SANCHEZ-COLBERG
Castro v. USA
as 3:2024cv30053
Petitioner:
Christian Castro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Christian Dior Couture, SA v. Cafe Dior, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv30052
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, SA
Defendant:
Cafe Dior, LLC and Gissel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Torrey et al v. FBI United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10864
Plaintiff:
Michelle Torrey and Christian Soares
Defendant:
FBI United States of America, A.T. F, Brockton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Jeannite v. Pasciak et al
as 1:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Tyler Christian Pasciak and Margrette Albertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Caldwell
as 24-1272
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO PORTS AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EMMETT W. CALDWELL, CHRISTIAN T. DE JESUS, JOSE NIEVES-SALDANA and others
Badillo-Jimenez v. Cortes-Feliciano et al
as 3:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Nelson Badillo-Jimenez
Defendant:
Christian E. Cortes-Feliciano and The Municipal Government of Aguada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Newbury et al v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Nancy Newbury, Mark Hastings and Marcia Ducharme
Defendant:
William Morales, Peter Aser, Christian Belden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
