Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moseley v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2023cv06027
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Mandy Pettigrew, Camden Atkinson, Christopher Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Cooper v. Christopher Brewer
as 22-2636
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard V. Cooper
Respondent / Appellee:
Christopher Brewer, Warden
Rauch v. Precythe et al
as 5:2022cv06085
Plaintiff:
Mike Rauch
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Jeff Norman, Christopher Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Brewer
as 4:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Richard V Cooper
Respondent:
Christopher Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wickizer v. Brewer
as 4:2021cv00841
Petitioner:
Buddy Wickizer
Respondent:
Christopher Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kamp v. Western Missouri Correctional Center
as 5:2021cv06074
Defendant:
Western Missouri Correctional Center, Paul Drake, Christopher Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Kamp, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Ridgle et al
as 5:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brewer
Defendant:
Jeremy Lamar Ridgle, Sheila Matthews and Quinton Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brewer
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Moses Jackson, J Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut et al v. Burl et al
as 2:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Hurlbut, Delwrick Coleman, Samson Tillis and others
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Todd Ball, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik Muntaqim v. Larry Norris, et al
as 08-1877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malik A. Muntaqim
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, James Gibson, Disciplinary Hearing Administration, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
