Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Howard v. David et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00889
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Steward David and Officer Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stellar v. Howard
as 26-6985
Petitioner:
SAGE ANTONY STELLAR and Anthony Charles Hall
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOWARD
Howard v. Danzey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00870
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Warden Danzey, Warden William, Warden Royal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv08947
Petitioner:
Christopher Howard
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Howard v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01903
Plaintiff:
Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation successor by merger to formerly doing business as FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Howard v. Marsh et al
as 3:2026cv02799
Plaintiff:
Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Donald Marsh and Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Howard v. Luckie et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00658
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Warden Luckie, Warden Crown and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wright (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Officer Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3239
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03432
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
