Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Patterson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keith Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Massac v. Estate Chocolate Hole Land Owners Association, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Mr. Christoph Keith Massac
Defendant:
Estate Chocolate Hole Land Owners Association, Inc.
SORTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43701
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH SORTOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Handy v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Defendant:
All 50 States, United States Of America and American Territory
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keith Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Lumpkin
as 20-20597
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Keith Handy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schmotzer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv03754
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Christopher Keith Schmotzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01478
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34650
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv05394
Plaintiff:
Wendy Eidson and Christopher Keith
Defendant:
John Doe, Steve Williams and Alkire Son & Sons Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
