Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 9:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Lumpkin
as 21-11168
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sevier v. Grant
as 3:2021cv02899
Petitioner:
Christopher Sevier and Christopher Michael Sevier
Respondent:
S Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rosas et al v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co et al
as 2:2021cv03649
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Rosas and Cheryl Butler
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co, Willie R Jackson and Joseph U Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosas et al v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co et al
as 1:2021cv03649
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Rosas and Cheryl Butler
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co, Willie R Jackson and Joseph U Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. Lafourche Parish et al
as 2:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Grant
Defendant:
Lafourche Parish, FEMA, CDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. TDCJ
as 7:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Burgess
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinshaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01955
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Fairley
as 21-10752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Fairley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
