Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Perricone v. City of Mineral
as 23-11232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Perricone
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Mineral Wells, Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
VALDIVIA et al v. TOWNSHIP OF HILLBOROUGH POLICE et al
as 3:2023cv03660
Defendant:
SARAH PERROT, THE HOTLINE, LISA PUHALA, THE HOTLINE and others
Plaintiff:
ROSA VALDIVIA, ROSAMARIA VALDIVIA and EUDOXIA VALDIVIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
Christopher Cooper v. City of Columbus, OH, et al
as 22-3251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADMINISTRATOR CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL COOPER, Administrator of the Estate of Deaunte Bell-McGrew
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH, MATTHEW BAASE and JOHN NAREWSKI
JOHNSON v. KEPLER
as 1:2020cv03084
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIEL KEPLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Washington et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Roy Washington and Jason Woosley
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
