Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ramos v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv05488
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ramos
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Martinez et al v. CMG Solutions Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv61257
Defendant:
CMG Solutions Inc. and Eric Nicholsberg
Plaintiff:
Devanee Amber Doodnauth, Christopher Ramos, Andres Felipe Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07908
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Oham
as 6:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Arron Christopher Ramos
Defendant:
Corporal Oham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53470
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65358
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2019cv05715
Defendant:
AEG Corporation and County of Alameda
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.