Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chism v. City of Chicago, Illinois, The et al
as 1:2021cv05835
Plaintiff:
Xavier Chism
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, The, Jason E Brown, Sgt. Michael E. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Urban League, et al v. Wilbur Ross, et al
as 20-16868
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KING COUNTY, Washington, ADRIAN GARCIA, HARRIS COUNTY, Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, and 18 Additional Local Governments, STATE OF LOUISIANA and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU, STEVEN DILLINGHAM, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Census Bureau, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
City of Syracuse, NY et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2020cv06885
Plaintiff:
City of San Jose, CA, City of Columbia, SC, City of Chicago, Illinois and others
Defendant:
Regina Lombardo, William P. Barr, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Urban League et al v. Ross et al
as 5:2020cv05799
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles, California, League of Women Voters, Adrian Garcia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Census Bureau, Wilbur L. Ross, Steven Dillingham and others
Amicus Curiae:
Lush Cosmetics LLC, Zendesk Inc., State of New York and others
Petitioner:
State of Louisiana and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Chicago, Illinois, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1226
Petitioner:
King County, Washington, City of St. Paul, MN, City of Olympia, Washington and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State of New York v. United States Department of Co
as 19-212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant:
Ron S. Jarmin, in his capacity as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Census Bureau, an agency within the United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the Census and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
