Cases 1 - 10 of 236
New v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fisher v. Kissee et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Fisher
Defendant:
Officer Grady Kissee, City of Columbus, Columbus Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Estate of Donovan L. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio and Chief Elaine Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Sierra Simmons
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Chase W. Rogers and Randall C. Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saulsbery v. City of Columbus
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Vernon Saulsbery
Defendant:
City of Columbus
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
as 2:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC., and Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Horton v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2023cv03888
Plaintiff:
Richard Horton
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Brenda K. Walker, Sam Sias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
