Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Meitav Dash Provident Funds and Pension Ltd., et al v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, et al
as 22-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEITAV DASH PROVIDENT FUNDS AND PENSION LTD., GARY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CITY OF MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT TRUST
Plaintiff:
JACOB GOLDMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., THOMAS C. GENTILE, III, JOSE GARCIA and others
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09937
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Lead Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09977
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Lead Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv09438
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island, Dean Andersen and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Interested Party:
Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds and Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Lead Plaintiff:
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Andersen v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv08669
Defendant:
Grace E Dailey, Ellen M Costello, Lew W Jacobs and others
Nominal Defendant:
CitiGroup Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dean Andersen
Lead Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island and The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Employees' Retirement System of the City of Providence v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
Employees Retirement System of the City of Providence
Defendant:
Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc., John Gilson, Thomas C Gentile, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01002
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10498
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Actos End Payor
as 15-3364
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, A.F. of L. A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Food And Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health And Welfare Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Sales Company, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Ciprian v. The City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Fermin Ciprian
Defendant:
The City of Providence, James J. Lombardi, The Providence School Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
