Cases 1 - 9 of 9
City of Rockingham v. FERC
as 15-2535
Petitioner:
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM and AMERICAN RIVERS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
George Stokes v. Glenn Harri
as 15-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE V. STOKES
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN A. HARRIS, OFFICER OF ROCKINGHAM CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY and CITY OF ROCKINGHAM
YOUNG v. LEGRAND, et al
as 1:2012cv01003
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
J. O. LEGRAND, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAMY et al v. CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BELLAMY , ADAM COVINGTON , VERNON MCKINNON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Lisa Honeycutt v. City of Rockingham
as 12-1638
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LISA M. HONEYCUTT
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA and R. B. LUGABIHL, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Rockingham Police Department
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INCORPORATED
MCSWEEN v. ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2011cv00550
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING AUTHORITY, EUGENE MCLAURIN, ROBERT VOORHEES and others
Plaintiff:
MILDRED J. MCSWEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. City of Rockingham
as 1:2010cv00713
Plaintiff:
Terry Best
Defendant:
City of Rockingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HONEYCUTT v. ROCKINGHAM CITY POLICE et al
as 1:2009cv00912
Plaintiff:
LISA M HONEYCUTT
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, R. B. LUGABIHL and BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BARBER et al v. CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
as 1:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARBER, WILLIAM BELLAMY, CHARLES BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
