Cases 41 - 50 of 3,340
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Clark v. McAllister
as 24-60023
Plaintiff:
Candra Clark
Defendant:
Chris McAllister, Warden, Karl Gillard, Sheriff and Robert Q. Whitwell, Chancery Court Judge
USA v. Clark
as 24-10020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Telasa Clark, III
Ahuja v. Kinkaid Dialysis, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DR. TEJINDER AHUJA and Tejinder S. Ahuja
Defendant:
KINKAID DIALYSIS, MARK LYNN CLARK, Renal Treatment Centers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sanders v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Sanders and Christopher George Sanders
Defendant:
Warden Marcus Myers, Heather Cormier, Jamie Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Watts v. Clarke County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Clarke County Sheriff Department, Deputy Dices and Deputy Nathanial Wallice
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 6:2023cv01797
Petitioner:
Wayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Clark
as 23-40716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jermon Rodriguez Clark
Sanchez v. DOJ
as 23-40708
Plaintiff:
Paul Eric Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Robert F. Bryson, ATF Internal Affairs, Agent Graden, ATF Internal Affairs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
