Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Clay v. Northstar Anesthesia of West Virginia, PLLC
as 3:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Carrie Ann Clay
Defendant:
Northstar Anesthesia of West Virginia, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Palmer v. Steel of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Charles Palmer
Defendant:
Steel of West Virginia, Inc. and Clay's Performance Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Westbrook v. USA
as 1:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
Clay Westbrook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Long v. City of Princeton, West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Franklin Long, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Princeton, West Virginia, Tim Gray and Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Warden NRJ
as 5:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Henry Clay Davis
Respondent:
Warden NRJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The City of Gauley Bridge and Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Sulzer Pumps (US) Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Sulzer Pumps (US) Inc., Sulzer Sturm Manufacturing, Mark Black and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeal et al
as 5:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Department of Correction, St. Marys Correctional Center, Governor Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarke D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Barinder et al
as 2:2019cv00903
Defendant:
Singh Barinder, Silver Cargo, Inc. and Chandi Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
