Cases 11 - 20 of 9,317
Chroniger et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
James R. Chroniger and Darlene Chroniger
Defendant:
ABB, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Siemens Industry, Inc. , Flowserve US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erik Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS and TINA LANDERS, spouse
Plaintiff:
GINA PHILLIPS, spouse
Defendant - Appellee:
PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a/k/a Abex Corporation, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company, f/k/a American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, American Brakeblok Division and REDDAWAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ASTENJOHNSON, INC., B E & K INC. and others
HOSANG v. AGCO CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02061
Defendant:
AGCO CORP. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA HOSANG
Cross_claimant:
DEMING PUMPS , CARRIER CORPORATION , ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
AGCO CORP. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deane v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09136
Plaintiff:
Sydney P. Deane and Nancy A. Deane
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carrier Corporation and Eaton Corporation, as successor in interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fittery et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13385
Defendant:
Flowserve US, Inc.,, Foster Wheeler, LLC, Crosby Valve and Gage Company and others
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Fittery and Nancy J. Fittery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Charles Brinkman v. General Dynamics Corporation
as 15-1752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES B. BRINKMAN and LOUISE K. BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION and ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE INCORPORATED, J. HENRY HOLLAND CORPORATION, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Brinkman et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Brinkman and Louise K. Brinkman
Defendant:
John Crane, Inc. , J. Henry Holland Corporation , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cross_claimant:
General Dynamics Corporation , Electric Boat Corporation , John Crane, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Schutzbank et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08246
Plaintiff:
Barry Schutzbank and Roberta Schutzbank
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler and others
Cross_claimant:
Carrier Corporation, Continental Wire and Cable Company and RSCC Eire & Cable LLC
Cross_defendant:
Carrier Corporation , ABB, Inc. , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maguire et al v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co. et al
as 1:2014cv07578
Plaintiff:
Marie T. Maguire and A.C. and S., Inc.
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., A.P. Green Industries, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Trezza et al v. 84 Lumber Company, et al
as 4:2014cv01282
Plaintiff:
Anthony Trezza and Peggy Trezza
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Akzo Nobel Paints LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company , Crane Co. , Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company , Akzo Nobel Paints LLC, McCormick Asbestos Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
