Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Clemente Properties, Inc., et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC., 21 IN RIGHT, INC., ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth and in his personal capacity, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, EILEEN M. VELEZ-VEGA, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works and in her personal capacity and others
Candelario v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Clemente Candelario
Defendant:
Jose Ortiz and Vianca Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kwarteng v. Choice Temp Staffing Agency et al
as 4:2023cv40085
Plaintiff:
Clement Kwarteng
Defendant:
Choice Temp Staffing Agency and Social Security Administration
Rivera-Clemente v. USA
as 3:2023cv01317
Petitioner:
Joel Manuel Rivera-Clemente
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clemente v. US
as 23-1471
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEAN CLEMENTE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Jordan et al v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jordan and Shevon L Young
Defendant:
City of Providence, Sean Murnighan, Mark Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos et al v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Santos, Lydia Camacho, Jahnyra Santos-Yergeau and others
Defendant:
City of Providence, Steven Pare, James Barros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemente Properties, Inc. et al v. Pierluisi et al
as 3:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Clemente Properties, Inc., 21 In Right, Inc., Roberto Clemente Jr. and others
Defendant:
Pedro R. Pierluisi, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Eileen M. Vlez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
