Cases 1 - 10 of 16
United States of America v. Clement et al
as 0:2021cv02647
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor N. Clement, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Bankers Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
CLEMENT et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04658
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREW CLEMENT
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MYCEK et al
as 2:2019cv14115
Defendant:
LINDA VENNIK, BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN LAKES, JOHN A MYCEK, SR and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Clements et al
as 1:2018cv00574
Defendant:
Jimmie O Clements, Jr., Arbor Village Condominiums Inc., Kelly Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Clement
as 8:2017mc00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Norman J. Clement
Cause Of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Paul S. Clemente et al v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Clemente and Wilhelmine Kraus
Defendant:
United States of America
Jimmie O. Clements v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2017mc00111
Movant:
Jimmie O. Clements
Respondent:
Michael L. Hervey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
USA v. New Day Home Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
New Day Home Care, Inc. and Clement Pownall
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Clements v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2016cv01148
Movant:
Jimmie O. Clements
Respondent:
Michael L. Hervey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Clements v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2016cv00972
Movant:
Jimmie O. Clements
Respondent:
Michael L. Hervey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
