Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Clements v. WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
James Allen Clements
Defendant:
Mike Francis, Prime Care Medical, WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clement v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03358
Plaintiff:
Joretta Clement
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clement v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03264
Plaintiff:
Donna Clement
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11718
Plaintiff:
Naomi Clements
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09719
Plaintiff:
Kathy S. Clements
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05677
Petitioner:
Jon Paul Clements
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clements v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04095
Plaintiff:
Doris Clements
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clemente v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03525
Plaintiff:
Lisa Clemente
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv13813
Plaintiff:
Brenda Clements and Michael Clements
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
