Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company v. Cody James Hardy et al
as 2:2026cv01828
Plaintiff:
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cody James Hardy, Mersadie Nicole Hardy, Jessie Nicole Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
In re: Cody Dimmett
as 26-5208
Petitioner:
In re: CODY JAMES DIMMETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Southwind Risk Retention Group v. Triple E Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00945
Plaintiff:
SOUTHWIND RISK RETENTION GROUP
Defendant:
TRIPLE E TRUCKING, LLC, ELIO CHAVEZ CABRERA and CODY JAMES HOUCHIN TROXEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Martinez v. Shinn, et al.
as 25-6539
Petitioner:
CODY JAMES MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DAVID SHINN, Director Arizona Department of Corrections, JEFF VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Mosley v. Hart et al
as 4:2025cv00919
Plaintiff:
Charrell Mosley
Defendant:
Mashaun Hart, Vistar Transportation LLC and Cody James Elkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Akeroyd v. City of New Braunfels et al
as 5:2025cv01016
Plaintiff:
Cody James Akeroyd
Defendant:
City of New Braunfels, New Braunfels Police Department, Officer FNU Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. Godfrey et al
as 1:2025cv00049
Petitioner:
Cody James Meeks
Respondent:
Demetric Godfrey and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gensheimer v. Alguire
as 4:2024cv01935
Defendant:
Mr. Cody James Alguire
Plaintiff:
Melody Gensheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gensheimer v. Alguire
as 4:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Melody Gensheimer
Defendant:
Mr. Cody James Alguire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
