Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Subpoena to Clark Pellegrin, Jr.
as 2:2011mc02074
Plaintiff:
Coface Collections North America Inc
Defendant:
William J Newton
Movant:
Clark Pellegrin, Jr.
NEWTON-HASKOOR v. COFACE NORTH AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv03931
Plaintiff:
AUDRA NEWTON-HASKOOR
Defendant:
COFACE NORTH AMERICA, COFACE COLLECTIONS NORTH AMERICA, INC., MIKE FERRANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coface Collections North Ameri v. William Newton
as 11-1482
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COFACE COLLECTIONS NORTH AMERICA INC
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. NEWTON
Coface Collections North America Inc. v. Newton
as 1:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Coface Collections North America Inc.
Defendant:
William J. Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Southwest Casino and Hotel Corporation v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv01968
Plaintiff:
Southwest Casino and Hotel Corporation
Defendant:
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. and Coface Collections North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CIMBURA v. COFACE COLLECTIONS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2010cv01596
Plaintiff:
KEITH CIMBURA
Defendant:
COFACE COLLECTIONS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McCullough v. Coface Collections North America Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02724
Plaintiff:
Victor McCullough and Victor McCullough
Defendant:
Coface Collections North America Inc and Coface North America Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
