Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,381
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, et al v. SEC
as 24-3220
Petitioner: OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ex rel., RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, Attorney General and others
Respondent: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Coleman v. Perhne et al
as 5:2024cv10624
Plaintiff: Mark A. Coleman
Defendant: Perhne, McCumber-Hemry and Nagy
Gentry #132047 v. Grand Prairie Healthcare Services, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff: Richard Charles Gentry #132047
Defendant: Grand Prairie Healthcare Services, P.C., Unknown Coleman, Margaret Ouellette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00419
Plaintiff: Sarah Walker
Defendant: Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Khalil Coleman
Defendant: David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. FCI Milan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent: FCI Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armstrong v. Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff: Jacob Armstrong
Defendant: Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00851
Hatcher v. Valentine et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner: Allen Wayne Hatcher
Respondent: Warden Ann Valentine and Attorney General Russel Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lambert v. Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00310
Plaintiff: Kimberly Lambert and Kimberly Y. Lambert
Defendant: Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?