Cases 1 - 10 of 2,451
Micah v. Rural Community Insurance Services
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Micah Combs
Defendant:
Rural Community Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mason R Hazen
Defendant:
Trey D Lear, Blake Gruny, Bradley M Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Combs v. United States Government
as 24-3616
Petitioner:
PATRICK DAVY COMBS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Combs v. Rural Community Insurance Services
as 3:2024cv03444
Plaintiff:
Micah Combs
Defendant:
Rural Community Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
OTEY et al v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
DENISE OTEY, LAWRENCE OTEY, GWENDOLYN GREEN and others
Respondent:
LAWRENCE KRASNER, ADA JONATHAN FRISBY and JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03931
Plaintiff:
Crystal McKinney
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Sean John Clothing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
