Cases 41 - 50 of 90
State of California et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv00872
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Steven T. Mnuchin, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Southern Border Communities Coalition and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv01979
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-35914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRANT AND HEALTHCARE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
State of California et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv06013
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Nevada, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America et al v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
as 5:2006cv00055
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Virgina, State of Tennessee, State of Delaware and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Vallejo, Valley Center Municipal Water District, City of Santa Rosa and others
Intervenor:
City of Pomona, City of San Jose, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and others
Not Yet Classified:
City of Auburn
Defendant:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc., Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A. and Seal A
Petitioner:
Brian Wang
Intervenor Defendant:
Walter Wang
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-71982
Petitioner:
STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
