Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03340
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeremy Cordova v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv05301
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cordova
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05266
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bernal, et al. v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 26-5895
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BERNAL and CELIA BERNAL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHHLANG, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy and others
Christian Medical & Dental Associations et al v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv04236
Plaintiff:
Christian Medical & Dental Associations and Button Family Practice P.C.
Defendant:
Aubrey C. Sullivan, Sergio Raudel Cordova, Geta Asfaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordova v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02974
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Cordova
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cordova v. United States Of America
as 1:2026cv26087
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cordova
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cordova v. Hepp
as 2:2026cv01495
Plaintiff:
Anthony V Cordova
Defendant:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
