Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at02051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Doe BR v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv06287
Defendant:
Does 1 thorugh 100, Luz Albina Cordova and CoreCivic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe BR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv14168
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Genesis v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2026cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jerry Genesis
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Damien Rosa, Jeremy Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordova v. Martinez et al
as 1:2026cv03613
Plaintiff:
David Cordova
Defendant:
Jonlyn M. Martinez and Law Office of Jonlyn M. Martinez LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tony Lewis v. Garry Plaza Office Park Association et al
as 8:2026cv03168
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50 inclusive, Pedro Gomez, Frank Cordova and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordova v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00303
Plaintiff:
Chris Cordova
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
