Cases 1 - 10 of 33
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1779
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1774
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in the official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General, DEREK T. KAN, in the official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1506
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
Pace v. The County of Cortland et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Anthony AA Pace
Defendant:
The County of Cortland, Cortland County Sheriffs Office, Mark Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The County of Genesee et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv04386
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc
Plaintiff:
The County of Steuben, The City of Buffalo, The County of Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
as 3:2021md02996
Plaintiff:
Washington County Fiscal Court, Meade County Fiscal Court, Menifee County Fiscal Court and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey & Company Inc and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Tort Reform Association, State of Ohio and others
Interested Party:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The County of Genesee et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
The County of Steuben, The City of Buffalo, The County of Clinton and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The County of Genesee et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as NYE/2:21-CV-01039
Plaintiff:
The County of Genesee, The County of Steuben, The City of Buffalo and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Interested Party:
Plaintiffs' Executive Committee for MDL 2804
County of Nassau et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv00065
Defendant:
PLIVA, INC., MYLAN INC, DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Clinton, County of Allegany, County of Oswego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Nassau et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv07071
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pliva, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Clinton, County of Allegany, County of Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.