Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Thompson v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02463
Plaintiff:
Craig Thompson
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56511
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilera et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01512
Plaintiff:
Jerry Derrick, Allen Harrison, Michelle Guptil and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80813
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welsh v. Lamb County et al
as 5:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Deputy Jonathan Martenez, Chief Deputy Craig Thompson, Sheriff Gary Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Kornse v. Aceto et al
as 1:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Gregory Forrest, North Carolina State Bureau Investigation, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Kornse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Thompson v. StreetSmarts, Inc., et al
as 19-15758
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRAIG THOMPSON, an Arizona resident
Defendant:
STREETSMARTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVE BATT, an Illinois resident
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Eppler v. RLKMS Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv00152
Defendant:
Craig Thompson and RLKMS Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Eppler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
