Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant:
Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01970
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven v. Citibank, N.A.
as 19-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC, as assignee and successor-in-interest to FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,
Defendant:
John Does, Nos. 1-50, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DBS Bank Ltd., UBS AG, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, LTD. and FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, Ltd.
Credit Agricole Corporate and v. Black Diamond Capital Manageme
as 19-1086
Not Yet Classified:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC, Black Diamond Clo 2006-1 (Cayman), Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
Landmark III CDO Ltd. and Landmark IV CDO Ltd.
Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02002
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Pension Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Stachon v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01205
Defendant:
Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Zach Stachon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Zach Stachon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
