Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87969
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07344
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sanders and Donald Sanders
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrian Rangel v. Crystal Sanders, et al
as 14-3346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN G. RANGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTAL SANDERS, JOHN DOE, at Layfayette PD, CHIEF OF POLICE, Layfayette, Indiana Police Department and others
Adrian Rangel v. Crystal Sanders, et al
as 14-2645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN G. RANGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTAL SANDERS, JOHN DOE, at Lafayette Police Department, CHIEF OF POLICE, Lafayette Indiana Police Department and others
Middleton v. Quaglio et al
as 4:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Middleton
Defendant:
Sarah J Quaglio, Crystal Sanders, Victoria M Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rangel v. Sanders et al
as 2:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Adrian G Rangel
Defendant:
Crystal Sanders, John Doe, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Sanders et al
as 1:2013cv06934
Plaintiff:
Adrian G. Rangel
Defendant:
Crystal Sanders, Michigan State Police, Lafayette, Indiana Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thoughts Are Things Franchising, LLC v. Tarradath et al
as 3:2012cv01632
Plaintiff:
Thoughts Are Things Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Ceflyn Tarradath, Roberto Tarradath, Terra Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-10309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
