Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Sivak v. Christensen, et al.
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant:
A DeWayne Shedd, Cynthia Martinez, Jay Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cupp v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv02073
Plaintiff:
Roger Cupp
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jim Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPP Cybersecurity LLC et al v. Symantec Corporation
as 3:2019cv00298
Plaintiff:
CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC and CUPP Computing AS
Defendant:
Symantec Corporation and NortonLifeLock Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kathryn Cupp v. Perkins and Marie Callender's, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02211
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, inclusive,, Perkins & Marie Callender's, LLC, Perkins and Marie Callendar's, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cupp, et al v Brucker
as 2:2018cv02587
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cupp and Lawrence Haven
Defendant:
Jesse Brucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Symantec Corporation v. CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv04720
Plaintiff:
Symantec Corporation
Defendant:
CUPP Computing AS and CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Symantec Corporation v. CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv04720
Plaintiff:
Symantec Corporation
Defendant:
CUPP Cybersecurity, LLC and CUPP Computing AS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Cupp v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01228
Plaintiff:
John Robert Cupp
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Lakewood Community Association et al
as 2:2017cv04661
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Edwards
Defendant:
Lakewood Community Association, Family of Christ Lutheran Church, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
