Cases 31 - 40 of 343
Jacqueline Lenorlia Taylor v. CVS, Inc./Caremark
as 17-2304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS, INC. and CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
DEGREGORIO v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2017cv01999
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE DEGREGORIO
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION , NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, LLC , JOHN DOES (I-V) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 9:2017cv80390
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, Apple, Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Collazo v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
Orlando Collazo
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Detective Joseph Cirigliano and CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durade Zebari v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 16-2612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DURADE ZEBARI
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and WOODWARD DETROIT CVS, LLC.
Himsl v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 2:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Himsl
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, CVS RX Services, CVS Health and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WILLIAMS v. CVS PHARMACY et al
as 2:2016cv05196
Plaintiff:
DELLA D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY , CVS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Allen v. UNUM Life Insurance
as 16-2004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
Finn Pette et al v. International Union of Operating Engineers
as 2:2012cv09324
Plaintiff:
Anne Brophy, James McLaughlin, John Crooks and others
Defendant:
Cornel Sneekes, Patrick L Sink, Kuba J Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
McClendon et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
Bill McClendon and Sherrie McClendon
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
