Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henley v. Calloway et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Nikita Roland Henley
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Pamela Harris and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Atkins et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Atkins, Davis, Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Stone et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Demetris Peacock
Defendant:
Matthew R Stone, Rolanda Calloway and Capt. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Justin Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Pamela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Jerry Michael Beasley
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Shoemaker, Holtzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Hutchinson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
