Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Jones v. Twaddell et al
as 3:2018cv03186
Defendant:
. Williams, William Twaddell, Cameron Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenrod Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ryder, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 18-30824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD RYDER, both individually and as natural Father of on behalf of Michael Todd Ryder, II, LORI POWELL, both individually and as natural Mother on behalf of Michael Todd Ryder, II, NELL THERESA RYDER, both individually and as natural Mother on behalf of John Cameron Watson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CORPORATION, KINDER MORGAN GP, INCORPORATED and others
Taylor v. Unknown Nurse Practitioner #1 et al
as 3:2018cv03170
Defendant:
Unknown Nurse Practitioner #1, K Ashcraft, Patty Thull and others
Plaintiff:
Toola O Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01854
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mitchell v. Watson
as 1:2018cv04317
Petitioner:
Calvin Mitchell
Respondent:
Cameron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gills v. Watson et al
as 3:2018cv03047
Plaintiff:
Jaryan Gills
Defendant:
Cameron Watson and James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo Campbell v. Cameron Watson
as 18-1394
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALONZO CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
CAMERON WATSON, Warden
Human Rights Defense Center v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01136
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
John Baldwin , Daniel Sullivan , Shelith Hansbro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCottrell v. Watson
as 1:2017cv01557
Petitioner:
John McCottrell
Respondent:
Cameron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobbins v. Watson
as 1:2017cv08401
Petitioner:
Kareem J Cobbins
Respondent:
Cameron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
