Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024cv11028
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Jones
Defendant:
S. Campbell and J. Bush
Henry v. Clotfelter et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Henry
Defendant:
Eric Clotfelter, Wayne Barton, II, Mike Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Gibbs
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Warden Tony Mays, Lieutenant Charles Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dye #149800 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dye #149800
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Sherman Campbell, Unknown Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennington v. Crews et al
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Marvin Timothy Pennington
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Anna Valentine, Philip Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arlinghaus v. Campbell County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Executor:
Debbie Arlinghaus
Defendant:
Campbell County Detention Center, James Daley, Mark Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patton v. Weirich et al
as 2:2021cv02675
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Patton
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Judge Mitchell, W. Mark Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
