Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Robidoux v. Capital Accounts, LLC
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MEAGAN ROBIDOUX
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roussel v. Capital Accounts LLC
as 3:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
Amanda Roussel
Defendant:
Capital Accounts LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kareem Marshall v. Capital Accounts LLC, et al
as 23-13899
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS LLC, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
MARSHALL v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Capital Accounts, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mansoir v. Capital Accounts, LLC
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Salim Mansoir
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MARSHALL v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS et al
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARESHALL and KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CLARK v. CARTER JR et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
PONIE CLARK
Defendant:
ROBERT ERIC CARTER JR, FRANK VANIHEL, MIKE HERRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
