Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HOUSING EQUALITY CENTER OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PROMANAGED INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04894
Plaintiff:
HOUSING EQUALITY CENTER OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
PROMANAGED INC., PRO-MANAGED LLC, REVO CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
GORDON v. GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
GMH CAPITAL PARTNERS, GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP and SHAY CARELLY
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Horne v. Harbour Portfolio VII, LP et al
as 1:2017cv00954
Defendant:
Harbour Portfolio VII, LP, CWAM II, LLC, Harbour Portfolio VI, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Horne, Demarkus R. Horne, Jackie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Gomez v. Sun Capital Partners, Inc.
as 1:2015cv21389
Plaintiff:
Andres Gomez
Defendant:
Sun Capital Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Fair Housing Center of the Greater Palm Beaches, Inc. v. Al Coker & Associates, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv81275
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Center of the Greater Palm Beaches, Inc.
Defendant:
Al Coker & Associates, LLC , Cervera Real Estate Inc. , GB West Palm I LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Hamer et al v. Planning and Zoning Commission et al
as 3:2011cv01845
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hamer , Oakview Capital Partners, LLC and Oakview Housing Trust I, LLC
Defendant:
Darien Planning & Zoning Commission and Frederick B. Conze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
United States of America v. Cincinnati Capital Partners LXXIII, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00617
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cincinnati Capital Partners LXXIII, LLC and Paula Wisham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. The Bryan Company et al
as 3:2011cv00302
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Bryan Company, Bryan Construction Company, Inc., Steve Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
