Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. Carl Johansson
as 22-50303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON, AKA Keith Golatta, AKA C. Brad Johanson, AKA Brad Johansson, AKA Brad Johnson
USA v. Carl Johansson
as 22-50304
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON, AKA Keith Golatta, AKA C. Brad Johanson, AKA Brad Johnson, AKA Carl Johnson, AKA Jay Johnson
Bradley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Carl Bradley
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co, State Farm General Insurance Co and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv05548
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Anthony Hodges, alexandria holley and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bradley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv03183
Plaintiff:
Carl Bradley and Betty Bradley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv00664
Plaintiff:
Carl Bradley and Betty Bradley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Johansson et al
as 5:2018mj00110
Defendant:
Enrique Garcia (2) and Carl Bradley Johansson (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Davis et al v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv02776
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis, Joe B McFadden, Joseph S Mitchell and others
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Heritage Healthcare, Inc.
as 8:2013cv03148
Plaintiff:
Carl Bradley
Defendant:
Heritage Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
