Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Rona Kemp, et al v. CTL Distribution, Incorporated, et al
as 10-37
Plaintiff - Petitioner: RONA YOUNG KEMP, on behalf of Martin Young, ROXANN YOUNG, on behalf of Martin Young and CARL YOUNG, on behalf of Martin Young
Defendant - Respondent: CTL DISTRIBUTION, INCORPORATED and ROGER MCLELLAND
Young v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00403
Petitioner: Luther Carl Young
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIBLACK et al v. HAYMAN, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03944
Plaintiff: STANLEY L. NIBLACK, RILEY WALKER, EUGENE WILSON and others
Defendant: GEORGE HAYMAN, ROBERT PATERSON, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langendorf v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2009cv00203
Petitioner: Carl Young Langendorf
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Langendorf v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2008cv00093
Petitioner: Carl Young Langendorf
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00515
Petitioner: Raymond Carl Young
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00376
Petitioner: Raymond Carl Young
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health Fund et al v. Arkansas Aluminum Alloys, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00358
Plaintiff: Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health Fund, Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health Fund, Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health Fund and others
Defendant: Arkansas Aluminum Alloys, Inc. and Arkansas Aluminum Alloys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?