Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. Warden Ray
as 24-6155
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN RAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 23-11098
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos R. Hernandez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hernandez v. USA
as 6:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Carlos Michael Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hernandez v. Warden Joseph, F.C.I. Bennettsville
as 9:2023cv02239
Petitioner:
Carlos Zuniga Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, F.C.I. Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01215
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero Hernandez
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arvizu-Hernandez v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Ray and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. US
as 23-6045
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ACTING WARDEN
Arvizu-Hernandez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America and Acting Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01326
Petitioner:
Carlos Javier Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
