Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bryant v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv12811
Plaintiff:
Carol Bryant
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65140
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BRYANT and CAROL BRYANT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin et al v. Bayer Corp et al
as 9:2010cv80092
Plaintiff:
Jewel Baldwin, Charles Reeves, Thomas Weeks and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baldwin et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2009cv01657
Plaintiff:
Jewel Baldwin, Charles Reeves, Thomas Weeks and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ahmad et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02612
Plaintiff:
Indris S. Ahmad, Donald R. Andress, Edmund A. Arnado and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holder v. Close et al
as 2:2008cv10844
Plaintiff:
Carol Bryant Holder
Defendant:
Joseph P Close and North-South Trucking
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
