Cases
RUSHING v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89278
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. RUSHING, CHARLES A. RUSHING, CAROL RUSHING and others
Defendant: A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
RUSHING et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88559
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. RUSHING and CAROL RUSHING
Defendant: AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
James v. Pike County et al
as 3:2009cv00188
Plaintiff: Alanza Carda James
Defendant: Pike County, Mark Shepard, Jane Causey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LeClair v. Hunt et al
as 1:2008cv00034
Plaintiff: Frederick Charles LeClair
Defendant: Linda Hunt, Cass Cherry, Jody LeFevre and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proby et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00855
Plaintiff: William Mae Proby, Judith Ranney, Shirley Ray and others
Defendant: Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Shepherd et al
as 3:2008cv00082
Plaintiff: Alanza Carda James
Defendant: Mark Shepherd, Steven Rushing, Jane Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PROBY et al v. MERCK & CO. INC.
as 1:2007cv02271
Plaintiff: WILLIE MAE PROBY, JUDITY RANNEY, SHIRLEY RAY and others
Defendant: MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
FOSTER, et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, et al
as 2:2007cv66082
Plaintiff: CURTIS E. FOSTER, PATRICIA FOSTER, JOHNNIE HATTABAUGH and others
Defendant: A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?