Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tinker v. Johnson et al
as 8:2020cv02390
Defendant:
James Simons, Joseph Biden, Dawn Tinker and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela R Tinker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mahoney et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv00258
Defendant:
Sacramento Police Department and City of Sacramento
Plaintiff:
Suracha Xiong, Caroline Kennedy, Brandon Allen, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone et al v. Keisei Electric Railway Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24040
Defendant:
Tsudanuma Central General Hospital, Yoshiharu Yano, U.S. Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Stone and Miyuki Suzuki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Kennedy
as 1:2015cv08690
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Kennedy
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rajicovic v. Clinton et al
as 1:2015cv08568
Plaintiff:
Ljubica Rajicovic
Defendant:
William Bill Clinton , Peter Bruningen, Hillary Rhodam Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2011cv01566
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy, United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Goldstine Skodzki Russian Nemec and Huff, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rambo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09142
Plaintiff:
Heidi Rambo
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer James Murray, Caroline Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diana Dial v. Kennedy, et al
as 09-50621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANA DIAL
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNEDY, Senator and CAROLINE KENNEDY
Dial v. Kennedy et al
as 6:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Diana Dial
Defendant:
Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
