Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Carr et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Latoya Carr and Joe Draper, Jr.
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Isaac Tyrone Carr
Defendant:
Pike County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carr v. Carr
as 5:2021cv00051
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Derick Carr
Plaintiff:
Isaac Tyrone Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Carr et al v. Brinker Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00202
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Brinker Restaurant Corporation, John Does 1-9 and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Carr and Charles Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malouf-Carr, L.P. v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Malouf-Carr, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Warrington et al
as 4:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Delta Medical Care Foundation, Baptist Memorial Healthcare Corporation, Warrington Clinic doing business as Clarksdale Family Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Walker Roxanne, Rasheeda Walker and Roxanne Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00243
Defendant:
John Does A-D and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janet Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00274
Respondent:
Pelicia Hall and Jim Hood
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rawls v. Walls et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Cyathia Griffin, A. Green, Lavonne Walls and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
