Cases 11 - 20 of 50
DANBY et al v. CATALENT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04278
Plaintiff:
THE DISCOVERY LABS, INC. and SYBIL DANBY
Defendant:
CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS, INC. and CATALENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1798
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 19-3162
Defendant / Appellee:
MYLAN INC., CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS, BERTEK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN N. WATSON and CARMEN NAOMI WATSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Watson v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv04137
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Catalent Pharma Solutions, Rajiv Malik and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAY v. CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS
as 1:2018cv03462
Plaintiff:
LOGAN CHARLES RAY
Defendant:
CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
