Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
United States v. Navistar Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06143
Intervenor:
Hino Motors Manufacturing, PACCAR Inc., Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America and others
Defendant:
Navistar Inc. and Navistar International Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Scenic Boundaries Trans. Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 0:2014cv01352
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scenic Boundaries Trans. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. A and G German Cars et al
as 2:2011cv07051
Defendant:
A O Smith Corp, A and G German Cars, A and H Plating Inc and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Toxic Substances Control and California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Tank/Cleaning:
Chemical Transportation
Gammaloy Ltd:
Facet Energy
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CATERPILLAR INC.
as 1:2011cv01373
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
United States of America v. Waste Management of Wisconsin Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00346
Defendant:
Arcelormittal Mortgage Acceptance Inc, Master Lock Company LLC, CNH America LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
SPPI-Somersville, Inc. et al v. TRC Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02648
Defendant:
City of Antioch, United States Air Force, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
SPPI-Somersville, Inc., Somersville-Gentry Inc. and West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
West Coast Home Builders, Inc. v. Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02225
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, General Motors Corporation, USX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
