Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Cates v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet, Inc., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stroop et al v. Jannah's Real Estate, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00055
Defendant:
Hani's Texas Tires 8 Inc., Jannah's Real Estate, LLC, Al-Wahban Texas Tire LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Stroop and Chad Cate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cates v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Southwestern Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Nurse Doe 1, Southwestern Corrections, Capt. FNU Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv00871
Defendant:
FNU Cates, Doctor FNU Meija, Doctor FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zywave, Inc. v. Cates
as 4:2018cv00751
Defendant:
Justin Cates
Plaintiff:
Zywave, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Cates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv02935
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lorraine Cates
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salley et al v. Webster County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Salley and Bonita Cunningham
Defendant:
Webster County, Mississippi , Tim Mitchell , Dillon Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Hill County Pawn et al
as 6:2018cv00043
Defendant:
Brad Cates, Hill County Pawn and Danny Lee Teal
Plaintiff:
Colette Savage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
