Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Bostic v. City of Sumter County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawrence Bostic, Robert L. Bostic and Robert Bostic
Defendant:
City of Sumter County Police Department, Jessica Hatchley, Hsath L. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jackson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021ct03142
Plaintiff:
Cecil Edward Jackson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
US v. Cecil Jackson
as 14-6512
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CECIL EDWARD JACKSON
June Gosnell, et al v. Moore Handley
as 13-14625
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JUNE V. GOSNELL, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Grady Jackson Gosnell, deceased, MARY N. RAMSEY, as Personal Representative for the Estate of James Ramsey, deceased, FRANCES HORTON, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Harold Edward Horton, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MOORE HANDLEY, INC.
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2013cv00390
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cecil Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Cecil A. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cecil Edward Jackson v. Sara Revell
as 13-6229
Petitioner - Appellant:
CECIL EDWARD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SARA REVELL
Reed et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
Billy W Reed , James S Amos , Lynn E Andrews and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
