Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Soto Cedeno v. Garland
as 24-1018
Petitioner:
JOHAN SOTO CEDENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cedeno Salgado v. Garland
as 23-4149
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS CEDENO SALGADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rios et al v. Lux Interior and Renovation LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Ines Ruiz Rios, Alba Garcia Herrera, Reynaldo Hidalgo Diaz and others
Defendant:
Lux Interior and Renovation LLC, Katisleidys Martinez, Unknown Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stawicki v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki and IGGY
Defendant:
Ken Wade, Tim Weed, Trever Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedeno-Colmenares v. Garland
as 22-1578
Petitioner:
JOHAN ALEJENADRO CEDENO-COLMENARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04984
Plaintiff:
April Burch, Tarrah Ciarimboli, Alfred Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cleveland Constantine Browne et al v. Ayala Rodriguez et al
as 2:2022cv03827
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Constantine Browne, The Estate Of Wycliffe Johnson and Steely & Clevie Productions Ltd.
Defendant:
Ramon Luis Ayala Rodriguez, Luis Enrique Ortiz Rivera, Juan G Rivera Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Todd v. Loenbro Pipeline et al
as 4:2021cv00041
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe individuals or entities 1-4, Loenbro Pipeline and Roosevelt R. Cedeno-Zambrano
Plaintiff:
Marina N. Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedeno v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02144
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alexa Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
