Cases 1 - 10 of 18
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Agudath Israel of America v. Cuomo
as 20-3572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Agudath Israel of Madison, Agudath Israel of America, Agudath Israel of Bayswater and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae:
Interfaith Alliance Foundation, Covenant Network of Presbyterians, Equal Partners in Faith and others
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al
as 20-1377
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT A. ENYART, JOEY RHOADS, COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNOR JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor, State of Colorado and JILL HUNSAKER RYAN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Amicus Curiae:
INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, EQUAL PARTNERS IN FAITH and others
Kevin Mccarthy, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 20-5240
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 12th Congressional District, Cheryl L. Johnson, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and Paul D. Irving, in his official capacity as Sergeant-at-Arms of the United States House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David S. Schweikert, The Honorable, in his official capacity as Member of the United States House of Representatives for the Arizona 6th Congressional District, Kevin Owen Mccarthy, The Honorable, in his official capacity as House Minority Leader and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 23rd Congressional District, James Shipley Swayze and others
Amicus Curiae:
Individual Rights Foundation, Reason Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
MUTHANA v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2019cv00445
Undetermined:
Secretary of State MICHAEL R. POMPEO, Attorney General WILLIAM P. BARR and President of US DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
AHMED ALI MUTHANA
Defendant:
MICHAEL POMPEO, WILLIAM PELHAM BARR and DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Leonard Fyock, et al v. City of Sunnyvale, et al
as 14-15408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROD SWANSON, BRAD SEIFERS, WILLIAM DOUGLAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, FRANK GRGURINA, in his official capacity, THE CHIEF OF THE SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Shew v. Malloy
as 14-319
Amicus Curiae:
Douglas Hall, Law Enforcement Action Network, State of Maryland and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Reuben F. Bradford, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Dannel P. Malloy, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Connecticut, Maureen Platt, in her official capacity as State's Attorney for the Waterbury Judicial District, Geographical Area No. 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephanie Cypher, Rabbi Mitchell Rocklin, June Shew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Holly
Espanola Jackson, et al v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 12-17803
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, THE LINCOLN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH,, The Abraham Lincoln Foundation for Public Policy Research, Institute on the Constitution, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Policy Analysis Center, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BOYER, DAVID GOLDEN, ESPANOLA JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EDWIN M. LEE, Mayor for the City and County of San Francisco and GREG SUHR, San Francisco Police Chief
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Dorothy McKay, et al v. Sandra Hutchens, et al
as 12-57049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOROTHY MCKAY, DIANA KILGORE, DAVID WEISS and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATORS AND TRAINERS ASSOCIATION, THE GUN OWNERS OF CALIFORNIA, H. L. RICHARDSON, Senator (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA HUTCHENS, Sheriff, individually and in her official capacity as Sheriff of Orange County, California and ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF CORONER DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
