Cases 1 - 10 of 628
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Terry Donald Rutledge and Terry Rutledge
Defendant:
Brian English, Aaron Smith, Shaun Dwyer and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes-Sanabria v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cervantes-Sanabria
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Velasquez-Jimenez
as 24-10019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cristobal Velasquez-Jimenez, also known as Arturo Cervantes
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hilson v. Lynch et al
as 1:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Hilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, O. Dingle, Cammagay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Cervantes
as 2:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
James Ray Baker
Defendant:
Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
