Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rivera v. Murillo et al
as 3:2016cv02979
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rivera
Defendant:
Emurilsh Murillo, Tsimmosh Simmons, Domingues Adomiszh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arizona Family Florists LLC et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02638
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com Franchise Co., Inc., 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and BloomNet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arizona Family Florists LLC, Bradley Denham, Cheryl Denham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Rivera-Rodriguez
as 15-2445
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CESAR RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
US v. Julio Rivera Rosale
as 15-4555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR RIVERA ROSALES, a/k/a Julio Cesar Rivera-Rosales
US v. Julio Rosale
as 15-4556
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR RIVERA ROSALES
Lane et al v. Wolverine Construction Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Joe Lane and Eric C. Zamora
Defendant:
Cesar Rivera and Wolverine Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia Ortiz v. Cesare Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv04229
Defendant:
Cesare Construction Corp. and Cesare Rivera
Plaintiff:
Gaudencio Garcia Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta-Ramirez et al v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2013cv01774
Plaintiff:
Eladio Acosta-Ramirez , Victor A Alvarez-Valentin , Luis M Albino-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Intervenor_defendant:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivera et al v. Sodexho, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01665
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rivera and Sabrina Castro
Defendant:
Sodexho, Inc., Sodexo, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
