Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kauffman #360639 v. Department of Child Safety et al
as 3:2023cv08128
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman and Luke Z Yochai-Adams-Trimmer
Defendant:
Department of Child Safety, Arizona, State of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shores v. Dennis
as 22-6133
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH SHORES
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD DENNIS, Warden O.S.R.
January v. Dennis
as 4:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Phillip Earl January
Respondent:
Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harcourt v. Dennis et al
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
William David Harcourt
Respondent:
Chad Dennis and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Statham v. Dennis
as 6:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Kevin Statham
Respondent:
Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Dennis
as 5:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Curwin D Black
Respondent:
Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shores v. Dennis
as 5:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Shores
Respondent:
Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollett v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Chad Dennis Hollett
Defendant:
Mike Williams, M. A. Morel-Sepulveda, T. D. Yorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patino v. Hoeltzel et al
as 4:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
Virginio Patino
Defendant:
Chad Dennis Hoeltzel and Falcon Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Marshall v. Lee, et al
as 13-6062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LEE, Correctional Officer, A. ARMSTRONG, Sergeant, TRACY ELLIS, Case Mgr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
